眾生無邊誓願度
煩惱無盡誓願斷
法門無量誓願學
佛道無上誓願成

Master Sheng-Ru Website Logo

Dharma Teachings

18 Sep 2020    Friday     1st Teach Total 2628

Can a layperson cultivate to the level of a fourth-fruit arhat?

<h2 style="text-indent: 2em;">Question: There is a view that once innate self-grasping (sahaja-ātma-grāha) has been eliminated, the mind becomes free of hindrances, no longer fearing one's own or one's loved ones' birth and death, and no longer fearing the loss of one's property. This is certainly a great liberation, but is such a state appropriate for a lay householder who does not intend to leave home? If one truly cultivated to this level, it seems many jobs could no longer be done.</h2>

Answer: First of all, a person who has completely eliminated innate self-grasping is, in the Small Vehicle, a great arhat of the fourth fruit, and in the Great Vehicle, an eighth-bhūmi bodhisattva. A layperson cannot possibly cultivate to become a great arhat of the fourth fruit; the highest a layperson can reach is the third fruit, and reaching the third fruit is extremely difficult. A person of the third fruit is almost entirely uninterested in worldly dharmas in secular life and will certainly find a way to leave home; moreover, opportunities to do so are very numerous, and such a person has even less interest in family. If they do not leave home, most simply live out their days according to conditions, but there still remain some attachments not yet eliminated; regarding household life and work, they go along with conditions, without strong attachment.

As for the Great Vehicle, an arhat of the fourth fruit abides at the eighth-bhūmi bodhisattva stage. Such beings generally do not come to the Sahā world; even if they come to this world, they would not live as householders engaged in secular life, such as working to support a family—that is utterly impossible. Their merit is immensely vast; how could they stoop to such a lowly thing as doing secular work to get by? Their work of liberating sentient beings follows conditions, without a trace of attachment, so why would they demean themselves by working and supporting a family? In fact, even finding a first-bhūmi bodhisattva or a person of the third fruit in the Sahā world is extremely rare. Bodhisattvas who have attained the bhūmis generally do not remain as householders; they all leave home to liberate sentient beings—unless there are so many bodhisattvas that not all of them need to leave home to serve as exemplars for sentient beings.

——Master Sheng-Ru's Teachings
PreviousPrevious

Inference Is Not Equal to Direct Perception (Pratyakṣa)

Next Next

Is karmic obstruction (karmāvaraṇa) eliminated by the mind consciousness or by the manas? And how is it eliminated?

Back to Top