Those in society who engage in philosophy, psychology, and sociology possess extraordinary observational wisdom, far surpassing the practitioners in our Buddhist community. Why is the wisdom of people in Buddhist circles so feeble? The various debaters, professional and amateur alike, have powers of thought and observation that are painful to behold. They only know how to rely on people, not on the Dharma. With such weak observational power, how could they possibly rely on the Dharma? If all kinds of elites from society came to study and practice Buddhism, what would Buddhism look like?
4
+1