Many psychologists and other individuals in society do not believe in or study Buddhism, yet they can clearly distinguish between consciousness and subconsciousness. We who study Buddhist Vijñapti-mātra, however, cannot differentiate between the two—truly a shameful and embarrassing admission. If the observational, contemplative wisdom of Vijñapti-mātra scholars, experts, and specialists cannot surpass that of a psychologist lacking the wisdom of meditative concentration (dhyāna) and Prajñā (wisdom) in Vijñapti-mātra, then what kind of Vijñapti-mātra experts, specialists, or scholars are they? It is unclear why such a situation has arisen.
A: Here is my understanding: Some scholars, artists, and researchers often become deeply absorbed in their constant studies, thinking about them day and night, leading to a strong concentration power (dhyāna) that frequently places them in a state of samādhi (meditative absorption) without their conscious awareness. Thus, they can observe subtle details.
B: Correct. They possess meditative concentration, not deliberately cultivated, but arising from immense interest and passion. Because they are not bound by religious doctrines or dogmas, nor do they cling to religious notions of right and wrong. I have observed that many religious adherents, in contrast, confine themselves, living in a world of conceptual thinking. These scholars possess enthusiasm and a sense of responsibility towards their research and exploration work. Thus, they can focus single-mindedly, showing no interest in other people or affairs, and thereby discover truth and facts.
2
+1